With all of the fuss about the tiny high altitude hobby balloons, you might not know there are also a few low-earth orbit small satellites up there! Yes, these tiny 125 cubic centimeter packages are circling the globe and sending data to ground stations around the world. The map above is a snapshot showing the location of some of these orbiters (blue satellites) and the location of active ground stations (green antennas) that receive them. Each ground station uploads data through the internet to a central site which collects the reports and shows them on the map.

There are a lot of useful scientific experiments although the original intent was to create a “poor man’s SpaceX internet.” This hasn’t happened yet, but this has not been around all that long for a complete system to take shape.

These devices use low power spread spectrum, or LoRa communication modes to achieve downlinks that work well with small inexpensive ground stations. Indeed, a complete ground station costs under $40 if you have to start from nothing. Which is rather amazing given what you’d have needed just a decade ago.

Constructing and getting a picosatellite into orbit is a bit more expensive compared to the cost of launching a high-altitude balloon of the sort ham radio operators do. Thus these are frequently the domain of college/university groups and other space research outfits. The first one launched using this model was in 2021. This was FossaSat-1- the next advancement in picosatellite technology, sized at only 5x5x5cm and weighing only 250g. It is inactive as of March 2023.

The recent news of 3 more balloons shot down by US fighter jets has many folks worried about everything from other spying activities to alien invasion.  However, given what I know from the media (which can be unreliable, nevertheless) I have a strong theory about what those 3 balloons most likely were.  And if so, the truth should help you calm down about these incidents, if in fact you were a bit worked up with them.

All 3 balloons fell into a general description that I know as a “radiosonde.”  For many, many years and even now, satellite-based data gathering operations for weather prediction just don’t get the kinds of data you can get from a radiosonde.  In fact, as a youngster in the 60’s,  I often dreamed of one landing near me to recover for “reverse engineering.”  Instead, I bought some off of surplus markets to learn their inner workings!

So what is a radiosonde?  It is a small electronics package designed to receive GPS location information and at the same time measure temperature, barometric pressure and humidity (in the most common scenario). In turn, it relays that information to ground stations via a small transmitter.  Battery operated, they have a finite lifetime in use of a few hours. There are no cameras or video downlinks – just the data mentioned above. Wind speeds are reflected in positional changes. These are launched with balloons filled with helium such that they reach a maximum altitude and burst, leaving the small electronics package to plummet back to earth.

And who exactly sends these out?  There is really quite a mix of folks who do.  And as long as they are following established FAA rules, there is no need involve things such as permits or licenses.  These are typically less than 4 pounds, often much less.  The National Weather Service sends these up every day from different locations around the US.  Universities do, private research firms do and so do Amateur Radio enthusiasts around the world.  Some years ago at the college where I taught the Plastics Department crafted the high altitude balloon and the Electronics Department made a suitable tracking payload.  At least 2 were recovered – one in northern New Jersey.  Most of the others flew out to the Atlantic and were lost in the “soup.”  Every day, dozens of these are released all over the world.

If you don’t conclude from this description that these devices are harmless “robots” directed by the upper atmosphere winds, then I haven’t done my job well enough. I’d encourage you to do some net searches and see what is out there on the radiosonde topic!

Can you see what is up there in real time?  Indeed you can!  I took a snapshot of a reporting page from sondehub.org as I was writing this blog entry on a Sunday afternoon.  Here is what I found:

There is a lot of detail on the map, and I encourage you to go to sondehub.org and get a map of your current area.  The map is interactive, and the legends are well-explained.  So long as the radiosonde is programmed to send its information on certain common reporting frequencies, ground stations (often radio amateurs!) report those received via internet to sondehub.org, and they in turn create a realtime map with location data and other information about the devices aloft.  There is also a special version of the site that only reports amateur radio balloon beacons, https://amateur.sondehub.org

I’d be remiss if I didn’t add some additional detail about those sent up by the Amateur Radio folks (and also, other technology-based clubs out there, more on that later).  Nothing says you can’t have a solar cell array to power your device.  The main limitation is weight (4 pounds), so radiosondes sent in this small category are not going to be physically huge or pose a threat to the ground.  The pico-balloons of radio amateurs are barely over a few ounces. Yet these humble payloads can traverse the entire globe so long as they remain intact.  These might have been the types that China claimed flew over them!  Once released, these small devices are entirely at the whim of the winds. Indeed, after being blown up by an AIM-9X missile, there was nothing to recover!

Launching high-altitude, circumnavigational pico balloons has emerged only within the past decade. They are designed to be neutrally buoyant at around 43,000 feet. An 11-gram tracker on a tether, along with HF and VHF/UHF antennas to update their positions to ham radio receivers around the world. At any given moment, several dozen such balloons are aloft, with some circling the globe several times before they malfunction or fail for other reasons. The launch teams seldom recover their balloons.

Recently NPR published an article on the Alaska balloon, and you can read it here: https://www.npr.org/2023/02/18/1158048921/pico-balloon-k9yo  This was a balloon created by amateur radio hobbyists for their own learning and research purposes, and was launched under clear FAA rules for such projects.  If you really want to get into the “nuts and bolts” this site has kits ready to go for enthusiasts to purchase!   https://www.picoballoons.net/

Other balloons are sent aloft to test spacecraft components and physics experiments: https://www.npr.org/2023/02/21/1158303780/when-research-balloons-shot-down-scientists-worry

Yes, a payload that fails or doesn’t report through the standard means could pose some risk.  But if NORAD simply got a spare computer to put sondehub.org up for monitoring, we might save some stress on aircraft and early warning systems.

Methinks a half-million dollar missile to down a $100 harmless balloon seems like an overreaction, if not a waste!

Now that is a loaded question! The end of the COVID thing? Self-driving cars that actually work? A $20,000 electric vehicle with 450 mile range? [I’d go for a Mr. Fusion like Doc in Back to the Future]

No doubt 2022 will continue to bring some new innovations to meet the challenges of these days. How about the focus of much of this blog: Additive Manufacturing?

I suspect that 2022 will be more incremental improvements, especially in novel materials. I don’t expect a $500 3D metal printer for home use, but I do expect that prices of 3D metal printing will continue to become more affordable from vendors such as Shapeways and Xometry. New novel polymeric materials could also be an important aspect of even home-based equipment.

Anyway, I’d suggest looking past the news of pandemic problems to stories of problems solved in 2022!

So this is not additive manufacturing per se, although it was used to prototype the device early on by the developers.

In 2018 I backed a project on Kickstarter for a metal detector that showed a lot of promise – Air Metal Detector – which used a smartphone app to run the system through a Bluetooth connection. The basic idea was to reduce the cost to just the active components in the coil and support structure while providing the option for more sophistication with the application. OTA updates of application and embedded coil software would permit fixes and improvements. Along with this was the potential to reduce weight but the final weight of course depends on the choice of phone. Promised delivery was for November 2019.

Fast forward to June 2021 – just as I was going on our first out-of-town vacation to a New Jersey beach resort, I got an email from FedEx stating that a package was being delivered the following day that required a direct signature. Thankfully FedEx now has package hold options at DollarGeneral stores, so I picked the one that was going to be on my return trip path home! But the sender listed made no sense to me and I had no direct notice that this was going to be the long awaited Air MD unit, though some weeks earlier I got a request to confirm my shipping address from the project.

In going back to the Kickstarter project page I soon realized I was in a very unique position at least for now – apparently I’m one of 3 or 4 to receive this out of 299 or so folks who pledged for it. Thus this hasty post (with more details to come) to prove I’m not making this up!

It did connect to the app on my iPhone and a quick test with a 25c piece worked as expected, but this is just a quick “all systems go” outcome. I’ll be working on more extensive tests and collecting some user experiences to share in the next day or so. If you have questions you’d like answered in all that, leave it in the comments. Two quick things from me already – the charging port is magnetic like Apple products and is unprotected from the elements. And there is no changing out an eventually defective battery – the head is sealed to IP65 standards they say, and I see no way to service anything inside.

Stay tuned for updates! I plan on comparing this to a Nokta Makro Simplex, which is my current favorite detector.

A bit of an update – I was waiting for the Android app to become available as it was not on the Play store or downloadable through their web site. But I continued to check. It did get out recently. I had some connectivity problems with Bluetooth – it would try to connect then shortly lose the connection with a cryptic error message. This did not happen on my iOS device – an iPhone 5. I am inclined to use the Android option because of a much bigger screen. My first test was on an LG G3 Stylus. However, after trying it on another Android phone I got the same response. The app installed on both Android platforms without any error or warning messages.

Weather here in the last 2 weeks has been lousy and wet, and whenever I’ve had an opening for a test I’ve been discouraged by all that. But I’ve turned on comments for this post, so please suggest things for me to try. I was out to a very rural wooded site using the Nokta Simplex to find old iron pins for a property survey – not exactly treasure hunting, but still valuable to the owner. I found all of them in quick succession, except for one that by rough measurement was under a large snowplow blade! Too much iron for sure.

And one more impression – I had occasion to try some comparisons with my Nokta unit at the end of the summer, in between rain and other chores needed when it wasn’t! If I had to choose one or the other I’d pick the Nokta. Both were pretty reliable in the simple stuff like coins thrown into my yard tests but I found the Air MD unit a bit “fussier.” While I want to do some “calibrated” tests at depth, time for that has eluded me so far. I have not found any of the major commercial vendors of metal detectors selling or reviewing it as of November 2021, but I’ll add any I find here. Plus, sooner or later I’ll probably find a more specific use for testing – or if you are reading this, please suggest one!

Talk about being totally distracted! This past year professionally and personally was filled with all sorts of new things. To catch up with everything will be difficult, but from the last post, yes, I did get the new Prusa SL1 last fall (but still under construction, however). Our new college Makerspace is fully up and running, and I’m the faculty-in-residence this year to assist with all sorts of things maker. Because my teaching schedule is now reduced, there is much more time for adding to this blog – hopefully things of value that somebody will tap my “Donate” button! 😉 Feeding me caffeinated drinks is the best way to ensure more technical content here!

As is obvious from date of this post and the last one I was not doing much blogging here – and for a good reason.  I was still very immersed in additive manufacturing problems and solutions, but my own personal life was so overloaded with family needs that blogging just didn’t happen.

Well, I hope to fix this several ways.  I have some neat project information to share involving additive manufacturing in the restoration of several antique automobiles.  This will definitely be the year of the liquid SLA printer – just take a look at Josef Prusa’s first UV/LCD unit the SL1:

Expected to be shipped end of January 2019, and yes I do have one on order.  I will also be posting a review of the Anycubic Photon too – it is a very nice unit that works well for me.  And I picked up a used Formlabs Form 1 – main issue dirty mirrors (that seems to be a common issue) and Formlabs nicely sent me a replacement set even though I was able to restore the ones in the unit.   Plus an upgrade to the SparkMaker’s system to increase resolution through a parts kit and a test run of T3D’s phone / tablet unit.  Maybe OLO / ONO (the much late phone based 3D printer) could appear!

I also expect to see some new breakthroughs in scanning.  I’ll be posting a review of Qlone (tablet / phone app) that recently got upgraded to 4K.

And as my college has opened a new Makerspace, I’ll devote one post to showing you how our design team of faculty and students created a unique facililty.

Happy New Year! 😉

As always, a new round of technology is on display at the Winter CES show in Las Vegas. Given that temperatures are in the teens where I live, warm and sunny Las Vegas sounds rather enticing… However, from my research on the 3D printing space there it is clear that the economic downturn and “cooling” of the market is showing in the types of new offerings. XYZPrinting is there in force with some new selections, but other than the new Markforged desktop metal printer, there isn’t much to be excited about. For one thing, that machine will not be a consumer-priced offering (and as of this writing no price has been announced).

I do have some reviews that have been neglected: the Pixelio scanner table is here, a Mod-T 3D printer, and hopefully by early February a Uniz3D Slash LCD-SLA unit. The Tiko mini delta printer also came just last week, and I’ve managed to get some prints out of it, but nothing great so far. At least I got one! It also looks promising to get the PolyMaker Polysher unit by early February too. I’ve tested a sample of their PVB filament used in that process and had great results – even rough polishing it with IPA in a perfume atomizer. I’ve worked with some Monoprice IIIP units including the MakerSelect and the prints have been fantastic. I’m going to tackle these one by one with some video included too.

And now on to my predictions for 2017 and 3D printing: the consumer space will further consolidate – and educational (read more expensive) offerings will be the norm. I’d like to see a reliable resin printer for under $1000 with decent software (it is possible). And I’d like to see some better 3D scanners. 2017 looks to be the year of IoT, Virtual Reality, and maybe drones… so I rather think that the additive manufacturing space will see less development for now. However, I would not mind being pleasantly surprised!

In case you follow this blog and thought that I’d been abducted by aliens or worse — no I’m still much in the game and there are so many things to catch up on. Such as:

We’ll look at the new MakerBot SmartExtruder+, Tough PLA SmartExtruder, and MakerBot Replicator 5th Gen Plus. That alone is a lot. I have tested the new tough PLA in the heat of battle – 3lb battlebots to be exact – and the three parts made this way held up exceptionally well. More on that to come!

A review of the Mod-t printer is also in the works. And my experiences printing TPU (thermoplastic urethane) have been really fun. Again, some parts made for a recent 3lb battlebot competition held up so well they came out without a scratch.

Liquid resin printers are getting into the mainstream – check out this awesome new offering on Kickstarter: The Morpheus Morpheus 3D This machine is using the concept of an LCD screen and appropriate lighting, such as the ONO unit coming out later (we hope) this month. The ONO 3D printer uses “daylight” curing resin (probably deep blue actually) from the LCD / LED screen of your phone. The promise is of smooth layers and even clear prints if desired.

Scanning is also an area seeing new options. Smartphones have such incredible cameras these days it doesn’t make sense to use some other imaging part. The long-awaited Bevel from Matter and Form seems to be still long awaited… But I did get my Pixelio scan table and can say it works nicely. More on that later too. Check it out here: Pixelio

So stay tuned – by US Thanksgiving holiday I should have at least a few new personal reviews out there.